SnailD's Throttle Table Fix

[dale_gribble]

I haven't noticed any increase in KR after part to wot throttle cycles since playing around. Again, my app tables are linear, so I can't speak to app curves and their impact.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

[Franky-5-Fingaz]

what have you guys been using for the Neutral APP Translation table? My guess is that this table would affect launches as much as the 1st gear table.

[Vansquish]

. . . car is not in neutral when it is in first gear . . .

[WetzMS3]

Originally Posted by Vansquish . . . car is not in neutral when it is in first gear . . .

Are you sure? Manual transmissions are hard.

[Franky-5-Fingaz]

Originally Posted by WetzMS3 Are you sure? Manual transmissions are hard.

My thought exactly, if im wrong thats fine. Just wanted to get somebody else's opinions before i made the Neutral tables 1:1.

[WetzMS3]

Originally Posted by Franky-5-Fingaz My thought exactly, if im wrong thats fine. Just wanted to get somebody else's opinions before i made the Neutral tables 1:1.

I was being sarcastic.

There are sensors that let the ECU know what gear the car is in, even if the clutch is still depressed. This is how LC on the AP and things like WOT boxes know when to engage and release.

[Franky-5-Fingaz]

ah, point taken. Thanks for getting your point across without having to add a No Thank you.

[Vansquish]

Originally Posted by dale_gribble I haven't noticed any increase in KR after part to wot throttle cycles since playing around. Again, my app tables are linear, so I can't speak to app curves and their impact. Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

Have you ever tried non-linear APP tables? In particular, have you used any S-curve-based APP tables? I found they dramatically improved the predictability of boost delivery at part-throttle.

0	2.43	4.77	7.01	9.15	11.2	13.15	15	16.75	18.41	19.98	21.45	22.83	24.12	25.32	26.45	28.93	31	32.75	34.3	35.77	37.3	39.06	41.23	44	47.59	49.76	52.22	58.15	65.65	75

[The Nut]

Originally Posted by Vansquish Have you ever tried non-linear APP tables? In particular, have you used any S-curve-based APP tables? I found they dramatically improved the predictability of boost delivery at part-throttle. 0 2.43 4.77 7.01 9.15 11.2 13.15 15 16.75 18.41 19.98 21.45 22.83 24.12 25.32 26.45 28.93 31 32.75 34.3 35.77 37.3 39.06 41.23 44 47.59 49.76 52.22 58.15 65.65 75

What turbo are you using this with (BNR?)? I've just never noticed a problem with boost predictability with the 2nd revision of @snailD;'s APP tables, but I'm still on a k04.

[Vansquish]

Originally Posted by The Nut What turbo are you using this with (BNR?)? I've just never noticed a problem with boost predictability with the 2nd revision of @snailD;'s APP tables, but I'm still on a k04.

Mods in sig.

[armyman]

How do these tables convert to Versatuner? APP consists of more pedal positions and more values in the DBW A, B and C