![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
| |||||||
| MazdaSpeed 3/6 - Turbo Induction MazdaSpeed 3/6 - Turbo Induction - Have a turbo, intercooler, downpipe question? Anything turbo related belongs here! |
|
Welcome to Mazdaspeed Forums . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. *When you join MSF as a registered user, there will be No Ads. *Registered Members get access to the Off Topic Area of the Forum *Registered Members have an opportunity to upgrade their accounts to VIP, which brings a host of goddies for supporting MSF such as Raffles, Additional Forum Access, More PM Storage, The ability to upload more Images and many other enhancements. *Registered members also get access to the live chat box! |
![]() |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() | | #1 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 227 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 10
Thanked 211 Times in 9 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 1 Post
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score Obviously, the BNR uses the stock hot side, so there shouldn't be any physical difference in the actual spool up times. My question is (and my friend and I were debating this)... if you have a bigger compressor housing, does the compressor wheel need to spin faster or slower to achieve the same number of boost? My friend thought it wouldn't need to spin as fast since it's larger and pushes more air, I thought it would need to spin faster to overcome it's initial compressor surge threshold and then would get into the target zone after that. He also thinks it's "laggier" duh to being a larger wheel, more mass requires more energy to spool it up. I sort of thought since it's such a small amount of rotational mass, it wouldn't actually cause much of a lag. Sooooo yeah, what actually causes the slower response of the turbo with a larger compressor housing when the hot side is still stock?
__________________ 2006 Mazdaspeed6 | SNR S3 | Stratified Tune | Corksport DP | Corksport TP | Cobb AP | SU TMIC | HTP 3" intake | HTP battery tray | 3 bar MAP | HPFP | Whiteline rear sway bar | SU Rear engine mount | SU rear diff mount | Forge BPV |
| | |
![]() | | #2 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Midlothian, Va
Posts: 2,461
(View Stats)
iTrader: (13)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 12,042
Thanked 1,838 Times in 1,013 Posts
Groans: 274
Groaned at 103 Times in 23 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score Could be the tune? |
| | |
![]() | | #3 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Trevose, PA
Posts: 7,012
(View Stats)
iTrader: (1)
Rep Power: 7488 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 18,940
Thanked 14,559 Times in 4,052 Posts
Groans: 224
Groaned at 80 Times in 67 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score Stock hotside doesn't mean it uses the stock turbine wheel or that the internal cross section of the housing itself is the same. Iirc they use a GT28 wheel...
__________________ MS3 has been retired to daily duty Project 1G; 1991 Eagle Talon TSi. 63MM Borg Warner Powered, Corn-Fed, 2.4L Long Rod Monster Under Construction Stock Turbo-Stock Engine Grand Champion of the World! 501WHP & 569WTQ (PERM Tuned, 93 OCTANE PUMP GAS K04 W/N2O!!) NATOR PA |
| | |
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to MS3-a(sore)ASS-rex For This Useful Post: | CJM (09-09-2013), El_Diablo (09-13-2013), helmetface (09-13-2013), silvapain (09-09-2013), Voltwings (09-09-2013) |
![]() | | #4 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: May 2009 Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 6,665
(View Stats)
iTrader: (1)
Rep Power: 10249 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 14,116
Thanked 19,668 Times in 5,045 Posts
Groans: 136
Groaned at 47 Times in 41 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score I believe it's equivalent to a GT2871. It uses a ported stock turbine housing.
__________________ |
| | |
![]() | | #5 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 227 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 10
Thanked 211 Times in 9 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 2 Times in 1 Post
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score Interesting! I did not realize it was ported! BUT, just for argument sake with my friend. If it DID have the stock side, but a larger compressor... which would achieve the same boost quicker (say 15 psi)? A larger one or a smaller one?
__________________ 2006 Mazdaspeed6 | SNR S3 | Stratified Tune | Corksport DP | Corksport TP | Cobb AP | SU TMIC | HTP 3" intake | HTP battery tray | 3 bar MAP | HPFP | Whiteline rear sway bar | SU Rear engine mount | SU rear diff mount | Forge BPV |
| | |
![]() | | #6 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,276
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 6,760
Thanked 1,819 Times in 633 Posts
Groans: 42
Groaned at 16 Times in 12 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score [QUOTE=timjustindodd;2247672]more mass requires more energy to spool it up. QUOTE] Careful with how you word that. You can actually use less energy to spool up a turbine with more mass. It all depends on how it is distributed. It is the Moment of Inertia that you are interested in. Imagine two discs. one has its mass evenly distributed around the rotating axis, the other has its mass located around the perimeter. The second disc is going to require more energy to "spool" even though they both have the same mass. That being said. I haven't read enough about BT's to know the differences between a KO4 and BNR S3 to answer your question. But in general a larger turbine will not have to rotate as quickly to move the same volume of air.
__________________ Coming at ya with all 297/359 POWER: HTP 3" intake, Corksport BPV, Treadstone FMIC, Cobb EBCS, Autotech HPFP, CPE full catless DP ECU: self-tuned HANDLING: JBR RSB (Middle Setting) RICE: Stickers and stuff, mudflaps, floormats, Evil M, etc. RADAR: Passport Escort 9500ci |
| | |
![]() | | #7 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 170
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 57
Thanked 142 Times in 70 Posts
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score just a guess but maybe you are simply hitting your load targets with less boost. stock compressor housing is a flow restriction. I'm guessing that upgrading to the S3 allows you to push the same mass of air at lower boost. boost is just a pressure differential
__________________ 09 CWP MS3 Sport - ATP GT3071r on ~E30, ACT 6-puck, TR8 FMIC, Bilsteins, etc... sold |
| | |
![]() | | #8 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Melissa, TX
Posts: 3,843
(View Stats)
iTrader: (6)
Rep Power: 5339 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 27,149
Thanked 10,246 Times in 2,732 Posts
Groans: 6
Groaned at 16 Times in 15 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score Its exaggerated unless you tune to help it spool, mostly by playing with the VVT to make sure that as soon as you punch it and the turbo should be spooling, VVT is at its maximum. You can also pull timing in the spool region to feed more exhaust energy into the turbo. The stock maps are setup to improve spool for the K04 and require a little adjusting to fit the BNRS3, with a few tweaks you will hardly notice the difference As to why. As was said, the moment of inertia is larger for a larger turbo, requiring more force for the same amount of time, or the same force for a longer period of time to accelerate it. Zigatapatalka
__________________ Ask Me About My: BNR S3 Turbo \ JBR WP 3.5" Intake \ COBB FMIC \ DNP EX MANI \ COBB DP \ MSCBE \ CPE HPFP CPE Injector Seals \ JBR Thermal Intake & Throttle Body Gaskets \ BOZO EGR Delete BC Coilovers (-2.5º F, -1º R) \ Saitek Front Endlinks \ SPC Rear Camber Arms \ Hotchkis FSB & RSB JBR 88 Duro RMM TMM PMM \ COBB AP (Self Tuned) \ EGT \ Oil Pres \ Oil Temp \ DashHawk |
| | |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ziggo For This Useful Post: |
![]() | | #9 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: vancouver,WA
Posts: 554
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 184
Thanked 663 Times in 252 Posts
Groans: 13
Groaned at 24 Times in 5 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score You need to keep in mind a larger compressor moves a higher volume of air relative to boost psi I.e. a 3071 will cram more cfm at 15 psi the a 2871 would at the same 15 psi, spool is majorily effected by the a/r of the turbine housing, secondary are turbine wheel, compressor wheel and combination of both. People who are familiar with the ego platform know of the black,red and green revisions of the stock Mitsubishi heavy industries TC which is a oe package with various wheel and ported housing combination total sleeper from outward appearance bnr is much the same for the ko4
__________________ 425whp/395ftlbs - GTX3071R .82a/r- 20psi- 92 octane pump fuel |
| | |
![]() | | #10 | ![]() |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Melissa, TX
Posts: 3,843
(View Stats)
iTrader: (6)
Rep Power: 5339 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 27,149
Thanked 10,246 Times in 2,732 Posts
Groans: 6
Groaned at 16 Times in 15 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score If you have two cars, completely identical except that the compressor side on one is larger, but for whatever reason they both see the same BATs, then they will both flow the same mass for a given boost. What really sets the boost vs flow characteristics is the size of the hotside of the turbo, the volumetric efficiency of the head and to some extent the back pressure from the turbo back. The efficiency increase (BAT decrease) from the larger compressor is not a huge driver, and the same improvements could be found with a meth system or better Intercooling. Phate's testing proved with e85 mixing in particular mass flow is not very dependent on BATs. Zigatapatalka
__________________ Ask Me About My: BNR S3 Turbo \ JBR WP 3.5" Intake \ COBB FMIC \ DNP EX MANI \ COBB DP \ MSCBE \ CPE HPFP CPE Injector Seals \ JBR Thermal Intake & Throttle Body Gaskets \ BOZO EGR Delete BC Coilovers (-2.5º F, -1º R) \ Saitek Front Endlinks \ SPC Rear Camber Arms \ Hotchkis FSB & RSB JBR 88 Duro RMM TMM PMM \ COBB AP (Self Tuned) \ EGT \ Oil Pres \ Oil Temp \ DashHawk |
| | |
| The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Ziggo For This Useful Post: | Agent_Orange (09-16-2013), breakfstincluded (09-17-2013), chaser27 (09-16-2013), ItsNox (09-22-2013), magicka (09-16-2013), phate (09-16-2013), SarcasticOne (09-16-2013) |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 08 A/C Compressor | mrjoshyman | MazdaSpeed 3 - Engine, Transmission & Driveline | 5 | 05-16-2014 04:31 PM |
| Video: Fórmula Truck - The bigger they race, the bigger they crash | Haltech | Automotive News | 0 | 08-02-2010 09:50 AM |